top of page

LONDON     |     NEW YORK

Search

Revolutionise Your Hiring Strategy: Treat Talent Acquisition Like Customer Acquisition

  • Writer: Aldo Binmadhi
    Aldo Binmadhi
  • Mar 28
  • 4 min read

Hiring is often described as one of the highest-return investments a business can make. Yet many companies spend too little on finding great people and then complain that “good talent doesn’t exist.” This contradiction stems from how hiring is approached. Instead of treating it as a critical growth function, many businesses treat recruitment as a cost to minimize. The solution lies in changing this mindset and applying a clear, data-driven framework similar to how companies acquire customers.


This post explains how to use Lifetime Gross Profit Per Employee : Cost to Acquire Talent (LTGPE:CAT) to guide hiring investments. This approach helps you understand exactly how much you can spend to secure top talent and why increasing your hiring budget can unlock access to better candidates and networks.



Understanding LTGPE:CAT and Why It Matters


Most businesses calculate return on investment (ROI) for marketing or product development but rarely do this for hiring. LTGPE:CAT is a simple ratio that compares the lifetime gross profit an employee generates to the cost of acquiring that employee.


How to calculate LTGPE:CAT:


  1. Estimate the gross profit the role generates each year.

  2. Subtract the employee’s salary and direct costs.

  3. Decide how much you are willing to spend upfront to acquire that talent.


Example in GBP

For example, if a sales rep generates £400,000 in gross profit annually and costs £100,000 in salary, the net profit is £300,000. If you spend £50,000 to hire this person, your LTGPE:CAT ratio is 6:1 (£300,000 profit to £50,000 acquisition cost). This means every pound spent on hiring returns six pounds in profit.

This ratio helps businesses set a rational hiring budget based on expected returns rather than arbitrary limits or guesswork.



Why Most Companies Underinvest in Hiring


Many companies treat hiring as a necessary expense to keep costs low. This leads to:


  • Relying on cheap or free job boards.

  • Minimal recruiter involvement.

  • Limited sourcing channels.

  • Low or no signing bonuses.


This approach narrows the talent pool to candidates actively looking for jobs and those who apply through basic channels. It excludes passive candidates and those in better networks who require more effort and investment to reach.


When companies underinvest, they often say “good talent doesn’t exist.” The truth is, they are not reaching the right talent.



Real-World Examples of LTGPE:CAT in Action


Example 1: A Financial Services Firm Hiring an Executive


A financial services firm estimates that a new executive generates £1,000,000 in gross profit annually. The executive’s salary and benefits cost £300,000 per year. The net profit is £700,000.


The firm decides it can spend up to £150,000 to hire the right executive. This includes recruiter fees, signing bonuses, and relocation costs. The LTGPE:CAT ratio is approximately 4.67:1 (means that for every 1 unit you spend on hiring the executive, the firm expects to get back about 4.67 units in long‑term value from that hire), indicating that the investment is justified.


By increasing their hiring budget, the firm accessed a wider network of qualified executives, including those not actively seeking new opportunities. This led to hiring a highly skilled executive who improved client relationships and significantly increased revenue.


Example 2: Insurance Agency Hiring Sales Representatives


An insurance agency finds that each sales rep generates £250,000 in gross profit yearly. Salary and commissions total £120,000, leaving £130,000 net profit.


The agency invests £40,000 per hire on recruiters, referral bonuses, and targeted sourcing campaigns. The LTGPE:CAT ratio is 3.25:1 (means that for every £1 the agency spends on hiring that person, it expects to get about £3.25 back in long‑term value).


This higher investment allowed the agency to attract top-performing sales reps with proven track records. The quality of hires improved, and turnover dropped significantly.



Eye-level view of a hiring manager reviewing candidate resumes on a desk
Hiring manager reviewing resumes to find top talent


How to Apply LTGPE:CAT to Your Hiring Strategy


Step 1: Calculate the Gross Profit Per Role


Work with your finance team to estimate how much gross profit each role contributes annually. Use historical data or industry benchmarks if needed.


Step 2: Determine Net Profit After Salary


Subtract the total compensation package from the gross profit to find the net profit generated by the employee.


Step 3: Set a Talent Acquisition Budget


Decide how much you can spend upfront to acquire this talent. This includes recruiter fees, advertising, bonuses, and any other hiring costs.


Step 4: Compare and Adjust


Calculate the LTGPE:CAT ratio. If the ratio is low, you may be overspending or the role may not generate enough profit to justify high acquisition costs. If the ratio is high, consider increasing your hiring budget to access better candidates.


Step 5: Invest in Better Sourcing Channels


Use the budget to:


  • Hire experienced recruiters.

  • Offer signing bonuses.

  • Use targeted sourcing tools.

  • Build referral programs.


These investments open doors to passive candidates and higher-quality talent.



Why Increasing Hiring Investment Solves Talent Problems


When companies increase their hiring budgets strategically, they:


  • Access better candidate networks.

  • Reach passive candidates who are not actively applying.

  • Improve candidate quality and fit.

  • Reduce turnover by hiring the right people.

  • Speed up the hiring process with professional recruiters.


This approach shifts hiring from a cost center to a growth driver.



Common Objections and How to Address Them


Objection: “We can’t afford to spend more on hiring.”


Response: Use LTGPE:CAT to show the return on investment. Spending £50,000 to hire someone who generates £400,000 in profit is a smart investment, not a cost.


Objection: “We don’t have data to calculate gross profit per employee.”


Response: Start with estimates based on revenue per role or industry benchmarks. Refine your numbers over time.


Objection: “Our industry doesn’t have high margins.”


Response: Even in low-margin industries, hiring the right people improves efficiency and revenue. Adjust your acquisition budget accordingly.



Final Thoughts on Changing Your Hiring Mindset


Hiring is not just an expense to minimise. It is one of the highest-return investments your business can make. By treating talent acquisition like customer acquisition and using LTGPE:CAT, you gain clarity on how much to spend and why.


 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page